Blast From the Past -- Tony Carr Calls Me a "Raging Prick"

He's right in his characterization of my lack of social skills when dealing with public servants who are failing at a critical junction in the nation's history, and who are engaged in the profession of conflict where we blow people into pieces and watch their arms and legs fly in separate directions, set people on fire, and instead of protractors and calculators, we have nuclear warheads that can decimate entire cities.  That being the background, Tony is correct that when criticizing my failing peers, doing so in a way that makes them comfortable and feel good about themselves isn't always, shall we say, a priority of mine.  Tony also got some other things right about me in his recent LinkedIn article that people may want to check out.

I don't have LinkedIn since resumes are not really my thing, unsurprisingly I'm sure, but somebody I know stopped by to share the comments from his article with me.  Depressing as expected.  Much too accommodating for fascism masquerading as intellectual debate and absent the kind of responses such views deserve.  Even now, even in this context, Tony sets a polite and cordial seat positioned at the table for those who hate our nation to its core, carefully going over the guest list to ensure nobody is uncomfortable while they call for outright tyranny with their tea and crumpets; a polite pseudo-academic center of gravity that has been exploited and that has led us to this day, but much more importantly, is leading us to a nightmare that will finally be undeniable to all.

Tony, now fittingly a long time resident of Europe and a dual citizen, how poetic, of King George's Britain (I sincerely hope we get a law passed outlawing dual citizenship so Tony can choose the United Kingdom where they routinely arrest hundreds of people for non-approved innocuous social media posts and are more suited to his tastes) makes a good host for this infernal dinner party given that he has maintained that no rights in our Constitution are inviolate and he believes any constitutional right can be violated so long as a majority wants to do so.  No constitutional amendment required, just mob rule, the very thing our Constitution rejected and restrained.  Those are Tony's actual beliefs and, his latest words notwithstanding, he has much more in common with those who issue unlawful orders than he does with those who refuse them.  His words may change with the ebb and flow of elections and narratives, but at his core, Tony Carr does not believe Americans have rights; he believes Americans have privileges that can be revoked at majority will.  These days he doesn't like the majority's political choice and what has followed from the current mob's fervor (nor do I), so he trots out my name for his thinly-veiled political hackery.

For all Tony's faults cataloged on this blog over the years, providing a place for discussion of important matters when it comes to public service wasn't one of them (even though he banned me from those discussions).  And then when one of his audience asked him why he was writing about me over on his JQP Facebook page and yet not allowing me to participate in the discussion, he repeatedly lied that he had not banned me.  Tony Carr writes real purty, but he has the key characteristic of all bad actors.  Insecurity that leads to dishonesty.  And, of course, he projects his character failures on others who hold a mirror up to him and reveal the phony that he is.  Like he projected here, ascribing dishonesty to me despite the thrust of his criticism being that I'm too honest, similar to how he has written he doesn't respect me and never could, yet in his latest article he begins by declaring his respect for me.  Somehow I become "one of the most dishonest" people he's ever encountered just a few hours after he tells his audience that we're not friends, or pals, but that he respects me.  Why would you respect one of the most dishonest people you've ever encountered?  Maybe he'll show the receipts for his claim that I'm dishonest, I certainly have a collection of my own, but he won't because his claim is just projection.  Dishonesty is not a characteristic of mine.  I inspire all kinds of emotional turmoil in poor Tony and he'll say the damndest things, and then the opposite.

Side note, Brian was the guy who sat CQ in my blog post about our Field Training camp experience, the most formative experience of my entire military career.

Tony likes to talk about truth, free speech, debate and having a thick skin, but like any politician those are just talking points for him rather than actual values.  He has to control the "debate."  Control of information is the first step to ensuring truth doesn't rear its inconvenient head and spill his fine British tea all over his perfectly fashionable white tablecloth.  Truth is fine, even useful for tyrants and oligarchs and propagandists, but only when it's controlled, otherwise, well, things get messy and truth has a habit of escaping its cage.

Such control of speech has turned the Internet from its promise of citizens discussing important matters, and using harsh words rather than soft bullets to build consensus and solve problems in our Republic, into the greatest tool of tyranny, propaganda, and mind control known to mankind.  Just ask free speech champion Elon Musk about that.  When I criticized a sitting member of Congress (who Tony Carr has unsurprisingly lavished praise upon), Elon banned my decade old account that had somehow survived those on the so-called-left operating the platform.  Dozens of appeals later didn't matter.  Because Elon knows, like any politician or Information Pimp, that most people are morons (and he loves to employ hypocrites who say one thing and do another) and that you can simply claim values you don't have and then take actions that are the opposite with little criticism.  Like Tony, he uses words that are useful even when he doesn't actually believe them.  Information is just a whore you send out to turn tricks.

Wise Americans, few that they are, realize words are easy.  Action is all that actually matters.  But if you can't even get words right, before you do your wrongful action and show yourself a hypocrite, you're a non-starter.

All this is just to say, Tony Carr was claiming to value free speech and debate while banning voices like mine, and showing he doesn't actually hold the values he professes, before it was still not cool.

Despite the highly censored landscape of today, Tony shares some truth in his article that we can all agree on (well, with a few caveats):

Alas, it jaded him. He's viscerally hostile to anyone he estimates to be morally lacking, whether he's ever met them or not. Especially USAF officers, hailing as they do from an obedience culture that adores deference and promotes those who ask the fewest questions.

He flames, trolls, and harasses hapless path-crossers for the sin of having their own opinions, unwittingly commanding mental compliance he knows is wrong. Rick enjoys conflict. He doesn’t observe rhetorical limits. He enjoys helping others acclimate to the discomfort he enjoys.

The first caveat is that I don't care about a public servant's personal morality.  They're free to be vegan and think eating meat is bad, put "He/Him" pronouns in their bio like Tony does and think that's a societal good, or believe whatever they wish in their personal lives.  However, as a military officer, they must be personally amoral, set aside their personal views, and act in accordance with the law and uphold their oath to support the Constitution.  It is the law that matters as a public servant given our law is the distilled collective morality of our nation and is the only thing that should be driving a public servant's actions.  As a military officer what you think is right or wrong doesn't matter, you must act as the nation has instructed you based on what it thinks is right and wrong as codified into law.  If public service is too much for you, go work for Amazon.

The second caveat is that me not agreeing with somebody and directly telling them as much without asking them if they want one lump or two, is not me commanding mental compliance.  I have no such power.  However, if that option were available to me, I would most certainly exercise it when it comes to military officers and all other public servants.  Get your thoughts correct, this isn't Burger King (no offense to the monarchy where Tony is a citizen), you don't get to have it your way, think and act correctly when you do your job, anything less is unacceptable.  While creativity and debate is valuable for how to best execute the mission, the basics of public service and our Constitutional limitations, our primary purpose spelled out in regulation ("to support the Constitution"), our law and our oath, aren't up for debate; it's not an academic circle jerk where you get to play cutesy with words to get the result you personally want (that just coincidentally meshes with your political affiliation), at least not in a sane healthy America, but of course we don't live there.

Last caveat, my refusal of an unlawful order in 2011 did not produce my correct thinking or make me jaded.  My correct thinking produced correct action, that's why since at least 2009 on this blog and long before that unlawful mission, I had been beating the drum on the importance of the oath of office and knowing the Constitution in order to fulfill the obligations of public service correctly.  Well before the unlawful mission, I was ordered by Lt Col Richard Nesmith, my squadron commander when I was teaching Undergraduate Pilot Training, to stop talking about the Constitution with student pilots (I asked for the order in writing, he refused, so I figured he changed his mind on his order).  I knew of the importance of faithful public service and dedicated energy into trying to mentor younger officers to understand the gravity of their executive positions well before I was put into the hot seat myself.  If you don't think correctly, you will most certainly not act correctly should you find yourself in a similar situation.  Check the tapes.

But all these years later, the fact remains that Tony Carr is nothing more than words he doesn't actually believe and can't quite get right.  So of course a guy who exists only in words would continue to be fascinated by me and seek to write about my words-made-action.  That's the closest a guy like Tony can get to actually being the ideal he imperfectly pretends to be on paper.  It's a love/hate thing I encounter from beta males who read too many books on knights and heroes slaying dragons, who then latch on to me while hating my toxic masculinity or my narcissism or whatever limp-wristed term they apply to me to express how they hate how I make them feel about themselves while frustratingly admiring me.  Maybe if Tony can one day get words right, he'll be better suited to actually embody them in deed and won't feel so insecure.  Deeds not words.

And, Tony, I had to share the image up top.  It's one of my favorites and, after all, I'm a raging prick.  But at least I didn't share the one making fun of the fact that, while you were a student at Harvard Law School no less, you thought you zinged me while only demonstrating you didn't know that Thomas Jefferson wasn't an author of the Constitution.  Of course, who would expect a British citizen to know our history?

Oh, and for those who want to stop by and share your view that I'm a "total asshole" while collecting a like from Tony, you can do that on his Substack where he posts a similar article.

Hey Prosuper, Never Miss An Opportunity to STFU

Just one of many idiots over at the Digital Clown Show fumbling to defend the legally indefensible.  It's noticeable he doesn't talk about the War Powers Resolution and not surprisingly, never quotes any of the laws he lists (but hasn't read) to show how they support murdering Venezuelan boat operators.  He also is confused as to what is "liberal" having apparently missed the whole conversation that conservatives want to conserve the recognition of our laws and rights and restrain government.  But he's a moron who hasn't thought about anything of the things he brings up.

But with an officer like Brabus to lead him, what would we expect?  Brabus has now walked back his assertion that the strikes don't come even "remotely close" to crossing a legal line, to now being made aware of the War Powers Resolution, mischaracterizing it, and claiming it's now a "grey area."  It wasn't remotely close the day before, but now it's a gray area because Brabus-the-Brainiac thinks drugs being smuggled into the United States is what they meant when they wrote about unilateral POTUS action in response to an attack on the United States or its military.  Just like any idiot leftist blue-haired nut job, Brabus demonstrates no integrity and an oh-so-clever ability to twist words ("what is a woman?") to get the result he wants, without any concern for how utterly stupid he looks doing it.

But anyway, we're talking about Prosuper's vomiting a list of laws he doesn't understand and hasn't tried to understand, none of which do what he claims.  He put no effort into his assertion without evidence, so I won't do much more.  Note that even the treaty from the United Nations doesn't do what he says, and the United States never ratified that treaty anyway so it's not even legally binding.

10 USC 124

10 USC 522

10 USC 526

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) -- Not Legally Binding on the U.S.

So Prosuper, don't miss an opportunity to STFU.  Seriously, you fucking moron.

Idiocracy Meets Stripes - the Dumbification of the Military Officer Corps

 

This blog is nothing, as its three readers will attest, if not a long prediction of a turnkey tyranny due to an incompetent and unprincipled military officer class.  Leave it to the Digital Clown Show to provide evidence as usual.  Idiot military officers plus social media does not disappoint.

Brabus, a military officer and pilot, in a profession of lethality, educated by the American taxpayer and sworn to support the Constitution of the United States, doesn't think the strikes on Venezuelan boats even come close to a legal red line.

Wow, breathtaking incompetence from a guy who doesn't know the first thing about his job.

Even those without his college education might go, "hmm, using the military to kill people for crimes seems kind of new.  I wonder why we just started doing that?"

They might wonder why suspected criminals, more than a thousand miles away, are suddenly being vaporized without evidence being presented to anybody, instead of the Coast Guard rolling up on them and arresting them, searching the vessels, photographing evidence and putting criminals on trial.  Since simply blowing them up is apparently not even close to any legal line, why didn't we do that all along?

History buffs might remember how the U.S. military went into Panama, and lost American service members during the operation, to arrest Manuel Noriega for suspected drug smuggling and then gave him a trial and imprisoned him.  Why didn't the military simply kill him from the air as the current administration is doing?  Why spend all that money and sacrifice American service member lives for Operation Just Cause when Brabus-the-Braniac would have offered up Operation Just Cuz instead?

Even slightly educated people know one reason is because in the civilized world, post Enlightenment, we in the western world have generally had this feeling that Brabus lacks that, "well, we should be able to prove somebody has committed a crime before we punish them for it, instead of just killing whoever we want willy nilly."  It's kind of one of those things we from America have prided ourselves on that separates us from countries like North Korea or China or from the rule of King George (Brabus, that was the guy who ran Great Britain when we broke away and set up a system that included jury trials, don't spill your juice cup).  And, strangely, until recently it has been widely understood in the United States that crimes like drug smuggling don't come with the death penalty.  But apparently that common more is out the window as well despite the U.S. government's well known history of trafficking drugs and even getting American communities hooked on them (CIA, I'm looking at you).

Educated military officers (not to be confused with Brabus who simply checked a box without learning a thing) who swore to support the Constitution should be able to enunciate this line of thinking more clearly and point out that our supreme law requires "due process of law" before "life, liberty, or property" can be taken from folks.  There are exceptions for war, of course, and Brabus would no doubt claim we're in a war (because he's a moron as cartoonish in real life as he is in his avatar).

Somebody from Brabus' intel shop should sit him down and show him some flash cards.  "Brabus, I'll show you an image, and you tell me if the thing I show you is a war thing, or not a war thing" and then give him a treat when he gets it right.  Show him a flash card showing a tank.  I think he'd get that one right.  Show him a card with a MIG-29 and he'd probably get that one right, too.  But show him a card with a school bus, or an unarmed, unmarked, boat flying no flag and operated by men not in uniform and he might struggle.

Fear not.  Our Founders set up a system of rules and regulations for dipshits like Brabus.  All he has to do is know the rules and follow them and everything is good.  Then he can know if we're at war or not.

And in so doing, Brabus would discover that we are not at war with Venezuela or with Venezuelan boat operators.  How do we know this?  We know this because our Constitution gives the power to declare war to Congress and Congress has not declared war against suspected drug smugglers down south.  "But we haven't declared a war in forever," Brabus might proudly opine, and he'd be correct.  That's because in addition to giving Congress the power to declare war in Article 1 of our Constitution, it also gives Congress the power to make "all laws necessary and proper" for bringing into execution (hint, execution is an important word here) all powers granted to any part of the federal government.  That means that if the Constitution grants a power to the President, Congress can still dictate how that power will be executed.  Or they could pass a law on how to execute their own power and that's precisely what they did with the War Powers Resolution which dictates when the Commander in Chief can execute war powers.  And that law gives three conditions, 1) after Congress declares war, 2) after Congress authorizes war, and 3) if the United States or its armed forces are attacked, the POTUS is permitted to engage in war for up to sixty days with some caveats.

None of those three requirements are met with suspected drug smugglers.  So Brabus is right, this doesn't come close to the red line of legality.  It blows way the fuck past it.  There is zero question that the strikes on these boats are illegal.  None.

But given that our officer corps is filled with absolute incompetent morons like Brabus, our law and our oaths to support that supreme law have become meaningless.  And America is a lawless rogue nation as a result.  And Brabus is perfectly fine with that because he's never actually known America, let alone served her, and so he certainly doesn't care about her being destroyed from the inside.

You Coward Drone Pilots Need to Refuse These Unlawful Orders

It shouldn't need to be said.  Striking civilians in an undeclared/unauthorized pseudo-war about fucking drugs?  Are you shitting me?  What's next, drone strikes on people for their tax-evasion-terrorist ties without due process?  Jay-walker-terrorists being napalmed?  Get a fucking grip.  This discussion is as completely retarded as men being allowed in women's bathrooms, it's the same level of stupidity but with even more dire consequences.  There is no excuse for this un-American position being touted on social media.  It's not a left/right issue, it's a people being manipulated by the Internet issue and you need to snap the fuck out of it.  Particularly you military officers.

Break, break.  This video from THIRTEEN YEARS AGO distills what is happening right now.  Not because this particular POTUS is particularly bad (yet) or because of all the leftist lunacy and calling everybody Hitler (which really does make you tired of such comparisons, doesn't it, almost like a psychological shaping operation) but because it explains why so many among us today "don't do politics on Facebook" and choose to remain silent publicly, only talking about trivial matters to their neighbors and friends and countrymen while their nation is conquered and destroyed on their watch right in front of their eyes.  I have posted this video for more than a decade on this blog and it's well worth your time.

Learn the law that you should already know about your job, you spineless cowards who participated in these missions (and then do your country a solid for the first time in your life and resign).  But don't think this is one of those intellectual issues that requires a degree and a lot of study, it really only takes about ten minutes to know your profession if you can tear yourself away from the NFL game and its Drag Queen Story Hour half time show, or whatever the flavor of the week is, that you're so against with your professed opinions (but not your action).

It's pretty basic stuff.  We arrest criminals for their crimes and give them their day in court where a JURY decides their fate after evidence ("oh, you mean maybe politicians lied and those people weren't giving voluntary customers drugs???").  You don't just kill them because some politician tells you to (whether it's Donald Trump, or his twin, Mark Kelly, who won't name a specific unlawful order in all his media appearances because he doesn't actually care about unlawful orders, he's just playing his part in the puppet show).

Fuck Trump and fuck Kelly.

Don't let these political pieces of shit factor into your obligation and oath before the American people.  And don't factor your own convenience into your obligations of public service!  If you know you don't have what it takes for such a difficult job, then go get a job on the outside!

Don't be like Dave Blair.  Demonstrate your love of America by your actions when it's hard, not by your made up bullshit words and professions about the Constitution for a military journal, followed by your failure shielded by some dark shipping container and secrecy.  Maybe nobody will ever know your coward name and you'll get promoted, but YOU will know you're a worthless un-American pussy.  And others will too.  Eagle or stars on your shoulder ain't shit compared to innocent lives taken, duty shirked and the once greatest nation to ever exist being extinguished... by worthless people like you charged with defending it, funded by a single mom who works at Waffle House and who struggles to make ends meet instead of playing grab ass at the golf course on the public dime, and who expects you to defend her family's freedom with the money forced from her insufficient bank account.

If you can't do that, get the fuck out!  The slippery slope argument is tired and you're going to be seeing trains headed toward camps here soon.  Some of you clowns will be driving them.

If you bastards can't figure it out very quickly (having failed to figure it out already as you should have), I sincerely pray there is a reckoning, and you get the due process required for your treason and your cowardice and for the suffering that you inflict upon struggling Americans who can't depend on you to get it right with your tax-paid education and training and your six figure salary.

Seth Hettena Writes About Me Refusing an Unlawful Order in "The After-Action Report"

Trump Says Urging Troops to Refuse Illegal Orders Is “Sedition.” This Air Force Officer Once Did Just That. by Seth Hettena

In 2011, Air Force Maj. Richard Rynearson refused a drone strike he believed was unconstitutional in a real-world test of the debate now consuming Washington.

Read on Substack

I have been contacted a handful of times by reporters wanting to talk about the mission I refused.  I have declined them all.  Despite my lack of cooperation, Seth Hettena went ahead and crafted an article about the unlawful order anyway.

His article is well done and fair.  It's always a pleasant surprise to see a journalist take their job seriously given how vital the profession is to the health of our nation.

You can follow Seth on Twitter and read his article here:

https://theiceman.substack.com/p/trump-says-urging-troops-to-refuse

As our criminal Department of Defense (so incompetent today that it can't even remember its own name) tries to intimidate military officers and retirees (and I have no doubt it will make good on its threats at some point), service members have got to do a gut check.  Refusing unlawful orders is mandatory, it's an obligation, it's not debatable no matter what the domestic enemies of our Constitution might say.  If you can't do it, get out of uniform now because your departure from the service would actually be the best thing you could do for your nation.

Senator Kelly, while a hypocrite who doesn't actually care about the Constitution (simply raising it for his political ambitions) and a threat to our nation as much as the current administration, is nonetheless correct when he says military members must refuse unlawful orders.  Things have gotten very bad in the nation, but they have been bad for a long time, and being a faithful public servant will never be easier than it is today (which is hard).  But there will soon come a day when exercising free speech will be far more difficult than it is today.  Just ask Sophie Scholl about unchecked power.  Then factor in our technology.  While you might feel safe speaking truth and exercising your God given right to free speech to challenge tyranny because you don't have a platform and therefore aren't threat enough to the tyrants, there will come a day when simply having a non-state approved viewpoint will be handled with extreme prejudice.  Use your voice now, be ready for the worst.  Truth is treason in an empire of lies, and it may well cost you everything.  Like it did for Charlie Kirk.

OFFICIAL STATEMENT:

The Department of War has received serious allegations of misconduct against Captain Mark Kelly, USN (Ret.). In accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 688, and other applicable regulations, a thorough review of these allegations…

— Department of War 🇺🇸 (@DeptofWar) November 24, 2025

Years After My Lawsuit the Border Patrol Surveils All American Drivers With Cameras

 

Fifteen years ago I sued Border Patrol agents for violating my rights by stopping me without suspicion of a crime and detaining me for half an hour.  Fortunately I refused to exit my vehicle so I was spared them destroying my property as they had done previously.  I'm a slow learner.  I burned about six figures of my own money trying to defend the Constitution in court by hoping the architects of the police state I had encountered would admit what they had created was unconstitutional.  The entire judiciary declined to hold themselves accountable with the exception of a single appellate judge who got it right but was in the minority.  Like I said, I'm a slow learner.  During all of this, lots of mouth-breathing boot lickers I knew held the position, "well, I never have a problem with them because I worship them and bow and scrape and don't care about the Constitution I'm paid to support."  But it turns out they have a problem with them now whether they know it or not.

The fascist organization within the Department of Homeland Security has expanded.  Here is what it is currently doing.

1.  Without a warrant or suspicion of a crime, tracks and logs the driving patterns of all Americans through cameras across the nation (the border was never really their thing as the flood of illegals has demonstrated, their real target has always been the American people themselves)

2.  Decides if an American's "patterns of life" are "suspicious."  If the term "patterns of life" sounds familiar to my three readers, it's the same thing we looked for when surveilling the enemy overseas.  So if you are driving to a new place instead of going from your residence to work, you might be flagged by the Border Patrol as "suspicious."  Don't let the fact that this warrantless surveillance violates the Constitution bother you, and don't lose too much sleep over you simply going to a new place raising "suspicion" since it's actually an improvement for the Border Patrol that there is *some* level of suspicion (that level being a moronic level for the average Border Patrol agent) given they've been operating checkpoints in the nation for decades and seizing people absent any suspicion at all.

3.  They then pass you as a target to local law enforcement so that sheriffs like those in the Bexar County Sheriffs Department in Texas, can whore themselves out to the federal government, remove the benefits of federalism, and advance the cause of tyranny at their local level.  Despite all the claims of sheriffs being of the people and a check on federal government, they're just lap dogs to the federal government carrying out unlawful operations because the federal government thinks their vehicular travel is suspicious.

4.  The local law enforcement then uses WhatsApp or Signal (to avoid FOIA law and transparency and keep their conversations from becoming known) to come up with a made up reason (a lie) for stopping you.  As in the case of the innocent American video above, they chose "weaving inside your lane" -- always a go to made up reason to violate the Constitution; the driver above had dash camera footage showing he didn't weave inside his lane but the boot-lickers will tell you the road is no place to argue the Constitution, you should instead wait for court after paying tons of money to then lose even when the court agrees with you, because of qualified immunity.

5.  The local law enforcement then stops you and can order you out of your vehicle and cuff you, thanks to the un-American ruling in Pennsylvania v. Mimms where the court says the safety of cops in bulletproof vests and armor and loaded with weapons is more important than a mere American citizen who pays their bills who is simply driving to the store in a t-shirt and flip flops.

6.  Then Border Patrol arrives with a specially trained dog (trained to alert when it knows its handler wants it to alert to give the pretext to search your car).  The Supreme Court consistently allows these dogs to provide "probable cause" for searches despite knowing the dog doesn't sniff for any particular offense (is it people, legal or not, hidden in the vehicles or is it drugs -- or a large amount of cash that government can steal using asset forfeiture without even charging for a crime?).  No matter, the dog knows what its handler wants and dutifully obeys much like a boot-licker.

7.  With the fake dog alert, the agents then rip your car apart looking for a reason to throw you in prison, or looking for large amount of cash to steal without charging you for a crime, and they're not gentle so expect damage as the guy in the video above suffered.

8.  After an hour or so of them not finding anything and destroying your vehicle, they tell you to have a good day and you get to collect your property strewn along the roadway, put it back in your vehicle and go about your way.

9.  You spend a ton of your own money to sue (unless your case gets picked up by one of the few remaining gems of America, the Institute for Justice) and then your case gets dismissed because the judges say "you're right, your rights and our supreme law was violated by the government actors, but you still lose because they have qualified immunity, good day to you."  And nothing changes except for the amount of savings in your bank account.

This is the absolute, crystalline, pure un-American police state that we live in.  It has gotten worse because most Americans do not value their constitutional rights and it is now at the point where even boot-lickers will be targeted and not escape the full dose.  Your bowing and scraping and subjugating yourself before your "bro" won't work in this situation.

Enjoy what your cowardice and hatred for America has produced for you and your children, Bryan T. Gray.  When the next Biden implements the next lockdown and you complain on Facebook (now that you're suddenly into rights and no longer in uniform and charged with supporting them) make sure you have a good laugh with the cops who pull you over for weaving inside your lane.

Elon Adds New Feature -- Removes It After Showing DHS Account Run From Israel

I guess it makes sense since so much American taxpayer money goes to that foreign terrorist nation that operates our government.  So it shouldn't be surprising that the Department of Homeland Security's Twitter account is run out of there.  Oh, you thought they operated our homeland's security?  Silly you.

Elon quickly disabled the newly released profile-location feature.

Edit: as would be expected, the corporate media has kicked into gear calling this story a hoax and misinformation.  That's possible of course.  The logo does look pretty suspect.  But, as usual, that such a thing is so easily believable points to a real problem regardless.  When President Trump meets with an Israeli spy at the White House, a spy who sent Top Secret documents (including a thousand names of American intelligence operatives) to Israel which then sent them to the Soviet Union, well, it's kind of understandable.  A person could be led to believe Israel runs the DHS account knowing that when one of his cabinet members, Mike Waltz, was caught spying for Israel, Trump made him ambassador to the United Nations rather than having him charged with espionage.  It almost seems like Israel runs our CIA and our government, so running a website really doesn't seem like that much of a stretch.

I'm just waiting for the American flag to be lowered at the White House and replaced with, well, you know.

And yeah, turns out the DHS page was in fact operated out of Israel.  The nation that has literally, quite literally, conquered the United States and which all Americans are occupied and fleeced by.

Traitors Tell Military Members to Refuse Unlawful Orders -- and They're Right

We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community.

The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.

Don’t give up the ship. pic.twitter.com/N8lW0EpQ7r

— Sen. Elissa Slotkin (@SenatorSlotkin) November 18, 2025

https://x.com/SenatorSlotkin/status/1990774492356902948?s=20

In a video released on X, various politicians remind American service members that they have an obligation to refuse unlawful orders.  And while these politicians include the anti-American traitor, Senator Mark Kelly, and the un-American traitor, Senator Elissa Slotkin, the fact remains that their message is correct even though they don't believe it.  Senator Mark Kelly was all too eager to have the government use force to murder and imprison Americans who dared protest on January 6th while the FBI instigated minor law breaking and the CIA planted a pipe bomb.  He is one of the worst politicians to ever disgrace a uniform.

Senator Slotkin is a career CIA officer.  She worked in the defense establishment under President George W. Bush while he had the CIA unlawfully torture people, and she worked in the defense establishment under President Barack Obama while he was having the military unlawfully assassinate American citizens outside war zones, who were no imminent threat, without charge or trial.  But she is really concerned about unlawful orders these days despite her silence, and most likely complicity, back then.  And, of course, she advocated for government violence being used against American protestors on January 6th because, you know, she's really concerned about the Constitution.

But despite the absolute despicable nature of the messengers here, there are plenty of unlawful orders the military should be refusing.  The strikes on Iran, on behalf of Trump's foreign owners, were unlawful as they were not authorized by Congress.  The same goes for his unlawful strikes on Venezuelan boats.

Their video says they will have your back if you refuse orders.  I can assure you, they will not.  Military members are nothing more than pawns to these scum on both sides of the pretend aisle.  But that should not factor when it comes to your obligation to refuse unlawful orders.  Nobody will have your back.  There will be no ticker tape parades.  Your peers will turn on you.  Faithful public service ain't no chump game.

The traitor currently in the White House, Donald Trump, is now calling for these politicians to be arrested and hung in yet another display of his unfitness for office.

But this is all theater.  Trump and these Democrats are working for the same awful people who actually own our government.  The goal is to get all Americans to consent to the full force of government being used against the American people in contravention of the Constitution.  Under Biden, the so-called Left gave its consent as it called for American protestors to be killed and imprisoned on January 6th, and while Biden labeled Trump supporters domestic enemies while Marines stood at attention behind him.  Then a fake power change through the facade of elections came about, and now consent is being gathered from the so-called Right using the justifiable hatred so-called conservatives have for the evil people on the Left who want to violate their rights.  The end result is most of the country consenting to its government being used in the worst ways to violate the rights of Americans.  Each fake "side" will just differ on who they think should bear the brunt, because they're too stupid and too unprincipled to realize that those wielding and controlling our government see their two sides as the same.  It's just theater to divide the people up and use their hatred against each other to grant them the unconstitutional powers they seek.

But don't worry, they'll let Americans on both sides keep their prejudices.  When the train makes its departure to the camps, they'll have one car labeled "Democrats" and one labeled "Republicans" but the train will still stop at the same destination.

None of this should matter to service members though.  Military members need to remember they serve all Americans (even the gullible and easily manipulated ones which make up a majority near one hundred percent) and they need to remember their obligation is to the Constitution and not a political party or individual.  The depraved politicians in government do not factor.  Ignore them.  Do your job.  Do it right.  Let the chips fall where they may should you need to refuse an unlawful order.

Joe Rogan Makes it Clear He's a Deep State/Israel Plant

 

Some serious propaganda jujutsu right here starting at about 22:10.  Theo Von brings up how people are starting to see those who are controlling them and Joe goes right into the discussion of how magical corporate owned Internet companies like YouTube (owned by Google) and Spotify are some kind of mystical alternative to "lamestream media."  As if corporations that own digital companies cannot be controlled by the same forces that own CNN, Fox News, etc.  It's an idiotic claim that Dave Smith and the man-child Michael Malice like to repeat (because they're trying to build up that space so they can sell out even more than they already have) and Rogan is happy to parrot this idiotic fantasy that you're not being lied to if you're on the Internet.

Then Rogan offers Theo some coffee and then launches into a long ass ad about Black Rifle Coffee (an obviously foreign controlled organization pretending to be pro-America that is actually anti-gun with its money rather than it's dumb t-shirts) and coffee history and irrelevancies, and then Theo tries to bring it back to real discussion by bringing up the courageous Candace Owens and Joe immediately rolls right into cracking wise about Theo using notes and then goes into ANOTHER ad campaign about "Alpha Brain."  This goes on until 28:00 or so and then fades into silence about the serious topics Theo brought up.

Joe Rogan is an anti-America asset.  That was clear after his three million references to how he had "F you money" and couldn't be controlled by the Woke (Israel) and saying people shouldn't apologize and then, once they got on him, he started repeating their nonsense and apologizing and then parroted their nonsense by saying that people of a certain color should not be able to say things, becoming the racist they accused him of being.

Rogan is not on the side of Americans.  He's a sophisticated enemy of the United States.

SSgt Michael Holtzclaw is an Exceptional Recruiter (for the USN, USMC, and Army)

 

The other branches should give SSgt Holtzclaw a recruiting award since his Desperate Housewives level of rant likely drove up the number of potential airmen into the arms of the other services.  After all, according to the official Air Force recruiting Facebook page, airmen should be happy to just accept whatever job they're given and not try to negotiate the best fit for themselves.  Just be happy about the "free healthcare" that is so free that you only get it in exchange for your service and potential risk to life and limb, in other words, the kind of healthcare that is the opposite of free.

Glad he took his post down but I'm amazed he put it up in the first place and kept it up so long despite the righteous backlash it engendered.  Perhaps somebody with some common sense above him took it down.

The service might also need to take a look at the requirements for the Levitow Award.