Veteran Wins Against Navy Base Commander Censoring His Social Media

Congratulations to the Center for Individual Rights on yet another victory.  This time it was a military spouse, himself a veteran, who was banned on the Facebook page of the Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay installation.  Apparently they didn't like his comments about a power outage.

That, of course, violated the First Amendment (that's part of the document the commander of the installation swore to support and defend) and the veteran, Sergio Rodriguez, filed suit on the commander and his public affairs staff.  It should be noted for morons and Stetson-something-or-rather law graduates that government officials censoring people on social media violates the First Amendment while non-government people censoring individuals does not, because the First Amendment restrains government rather than private citizens.

Sergio was victorious and the installation admitted it violated the Constitution and has agreed to change its policies.  Good on Rodriguez for his defense of our rights and, as usual, the Center for Individual Rights for doing the heavy lifting.  They provide pro bono services to clients and depend on donations for their great work, so if you're so inclined, please consider supporting their work.

There aren't many perks to legal action, but one of the few is getting to see your legal action help somebody else in their fight against tyranny, whether through legal precedent (which isn't the case for settlements) or by demonstrating that Americans do have some recourse which can inspire others to also defend our rights:

The pattern goes back further still. In August 2022, the Center for Individual Rights won a similar case against the Air Force, when a settlement required Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne Bass to update comment policies on her official Facebook page after blocking retired Air Force Maj. Richard Lee Rynearson III for critical posts, according to Military.com. Taken together, the cases against the Air Force, the National Guard, and now the Navy point to a recurring problem of military public affairs offices trying to curate online forums even as courts and the services' own rules increasingly say they cannot.

Israeli Thoughts on Using Debt to Get Americans to Join up For a Ground Invasion of Iran

 From the Jerusalem Post:

Economic enlistment for indebted military-age Americans

The narrative war on the domestic American front has already failed. The Pentagon has not been able to sell this war to the American public because the war has been rhetorically fused with Israel's operations in Gaza, and the American public rejects the fusion.

Recruitment numbers are running below what a ground invasion of Iran would require. Estimates for a successful ground campaign against Iran's 31 provincial commands and its Mosaic Defense Doctrine run between 750 thousand and 1.5 million American troops. The current active US Army stands at roughly 452 thousand. The math does not work, obviously. 

Based on American history, however, there is a path forward. Not conscription or a draft in a world war-era sense, but enlistment through a “debt forgiveness program.”

The average American aged 18 to 34 carries more than $40 thousand in non-mortgage debt across student loans, credit card balances, auto loans, and personal loans, with some estimates go as high as $100 thousand.

This is the cohort the Pentagon needs. A federally administered debt-forgiveness enlistment program that fully discharges student loan, credit card, and loan balances after 24 or 36 months of service, and extends the GI Bill, would produce voluntary enlistment at scale.

This is not theoretical.

It is the American state doing what the American state has always done when it needed staff it could not otherwise generate. World War II offered the GI Bill. Vietnam offered college deferments. The post 9/11 wars offered signing bonuses and citizenship pathways. The Iran war will need to offer debt relief. The economics of the indebted American 20-and 30-something make this the most efficient conversion mechanism available to the Pentagon and the Trump administration.

The moral reading on this is uncomfortable. But states generate the soldiers they need through the incentives that work on the population they have.

Just wait until Israel, which controls our puppet government, uses our unconstitutional draft in order to send our slaves to die for Israel against their will.  History shows this is often the fate for a conquered nation, supplying flesh for their master's war machine.

Traitor and Foreign Operative, Brian Mast, Considered for Secretary of the Army

So Florida's representative, Brian Mast, is being considered for Secretary of the Army despite him being a foreign asset who wears his IDF uniform in Washington DC.  Here is a propaganda article mentioning the move which doesn't fail to remind the reader that if you are concerned about a U.S. Congressman wearing the IDF uniform at "our" nation's Capitol, well, you're just antisemitic of course.  What a shocker the article comes from the great satellite state of Florida, where the Israel-puppet governor signs unconstitutional bills that violate the rights of Floridians, and does so over in the motherland that is Israel.  It's still mind boggling that DeSantis has any support whatsoever after that treasonous move.  There is the West Bank, there is Gaza, and then there is Florida.

Not that the United States as a whole is doing much better given that 98% of Congress takes Israel's bribes, the President is a foreign-asset, and Israel is allowed to murder folks like Charlie Kirk while its puppets in "our" government cover it up.  Not to mention their child trafficking intelligence operations.

Oh, and let's not forget the bill waiting for the Senate to vote, Section 1217, which would merge (hand over) our military and intelligence capabilities to Israel.  Our nearly-completely-owned-by-Israel media will, of course, tell you this is a conspiracy theory and it doesn't "merge" our military it just "increases cooperation."  So Israel won't have to spy so hard in the future in order to gain that "increased cooperation."

What a weak conquered nation is the United States of Israel.

Stop If You've Heard This One, a Pedo POTUS & His Foreign-Owned "U.S." Military Considers Nukes in an Unlawful War

There is no question that Trump is the most vile, most treasonous, most damaging piece of shit to ever occupy the Oval Office.  He should be tried for treason, for murder and for violating the Constitution ten times over in a myriad of ways.  All his administration and all military officers who participate in his unlawful war in Iran should also be prosecuted.

But if they use nuclear weapons in their idiotic, unlawful, war against Iran at the command of Israel?  If they do that, they should be tried and hanged.  It's as simple as that.

What a fucking nightmare this disgraceful nation has become.

Americans Asked to Be Fooled Again By "New" Party

Spoiler alert: the "new" party being peddled won't be any different.  If you think there is any way that our controlled media, controlled Internet, and controlled government processes can produce an "outsider" or a "reformer" then you have no grasp of our government, the technological landscape, or how power operates.

You're set to once again vote for "hope and change" and the "guy who will drain the swamp" with the next set of actors who simply have to say things, pretend to be against each other, and who once in office will serve the interests of the non-American powers that pay them big money, positioned them into those spots, and will snuff them out if they break ranks.

We don't have a choice when it comes to voting.  So go ahead and vote for the person who says the "right" things in your mind.  But don't think for a second that it will change anything.  It doesn't need to be pointed out that Tucker Carlson, son of a CIA agent, was pro-Iraq war (before apologizing) and spent a lifetime working for Israel-owned Rupert Murdoch.  There isn't any need to point out Joe Kent was CIA and has a pro-war philosophy that he dresses up as "not as pro-war" as Trump (who campaigned on no new wars).  So I won't even get into Thomas Massie's tells, because all you need to know is the system of incentives, the levers of power and the entire process have been corrupted thoroughly.

A real reformer isn't possible in our system.  But when you need a reformer, our foreign-owned oligarchy will provide you one on paper and will have its "outsider" influencers peddle them on "alternative media" just as Dan Bongino and Kash Patel and others did.

You're a fool if you think there will be any salvation from this government.

Lawmaker, Thomas Massie, Demonstrates He Doesn't Know the Law on War

 

Let me explain this absurd ruse: The Pentagon is pretending there have been two Iran wars separated by a brief cease-fire.

The reality: By going more than 90 days without congressional authorization @SecWar IS BREAKING THE LAW and must be held accountable. https://t.co/SuHcGkJcD3

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) July 24, 2026

Or that he's a sly propagandist, controlled opposition, purposefully putting this poison pill out there.  Given the rumors about his largest donor being a Zionist and his previous butchering of the Constitution to justify not voting to censure Adam Schiff, who really knows.

Massie falsely asserts that the President's unlawful war in Iran was lawful on day eighty-nine.  That is two layers of false.  First, the War Powers Resolution in section 1541(c) only allows the president to engage in hostilities absent a declaration or authorization of war from Congress, if in response to an attack on the United States or its military.  So the reporting requirements that Massie is referring to here are not even implicated.

This would be like a rule that says "if you have a driver's license, you must drive on the right side of the road" and then Massie talking about a six year old with no driver's license and pointing out that it would be unlawful for them to drive on the left side of the road.  No, they're not supposed to be driving at all, Thomas.  Second, even if Trump engaged with Iran in response to an attack on the United States, he is only able to do so for SIXTY days (not ninety) absent a declaration or authorization of war from Congress.  The ninety day exception in Section 1544(b) is only implicated if there is an attack on the United States such that Congress physically cannot meet in order to vote to authorize or declare war.

Thomas Massie the lawmaker sure doesn't know shit about the law.  This is an embarrassing showing that must be purposeful propaganda as I see it, and yet Massie is supposed to be our own temporarily allowed voice among all the Israel puppets?  Yeah, when the people need a "dissenter," the oligarchy will provide one for them...

Here is the controlling law that seems to elude all the propagandists and military officers and politicians out there.  Article 1 of the Constitution gives Congress two relevant powers.  The first is the power to declare war.  The second is the power to make laws necessary and proper for bringing into "execution" (ie how they are executed) ALL laws granted by the Constitution to ANY part of the government.  This last power granted to Congress is the power:

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

So for the clowns out there idiotically pointing to the Article 2 "commander in chief" phrase (as if that mere title means the POTUS can do whatever he wants simply because he has the title "commander in chief") make sure you check out the last power granted to Congress in Article 1 as quoted above.  The Congress can tell the President how to execute war.  Put in crayon words for all the dipshits making the idiotic Article 2 "argument," our Constitution says "Hey, President, you are commander in chief, and you will command and chief as you're told by Congress, bitch."

Congress did in fact exercise this power to tell the executive branch how to execute by passing the War Powers Resolution which lists three requirements in section 1541(c) before the president can engage in hostilities.  If the third condition is met, then the reporting requirements in section 1544(b) are appropriate.  Morons and liars love to quote 1544(b) to suggest, as Massie is doing here, that the POTUS is just allowed to start 60 day wars all around the planet until his heart's content and Congress can just lump it.  But that idea is not only absurd, it flies in the face of the clear text of our law.  But Massie certainly isn't making it any more clear to Americans on his social media by pushing out this pro-Israel pro-war anti-America tweet that misrepresents our law.

Section 1541(c):

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to

(1) a declaration of war,

(2) specific statutory authorization, or

(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

And if the third requirement is met (which it most certainly was not and is not in our unlawful war in Iran), then the sixty day period can only be extended to ninety days if our homeland is actually being attacked so badly that Congress can't physically meet (think of the Capitol on fire).  Section 1544(b) states:

Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 1543 (a)(1) of this title, whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress

(1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces,

(2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or 

(3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces.

When Thomas Massie isn't crafting his presidential run so that he can prove to be the very next POTUS controlled opposition disappointment, just as Trump has been, he might take a gander at our law before running his lawmaker mouth.

Responding to Kathryn A. Slye, Esquire -- An Epically Idiotic Pilot and Lawyer

Kathryn Anna Slye, who also goes by nom de plumes like Kathryn Slye Allen and Kathryn Slye-Allen, is one of the most impressive people I have ever encountered online.  I'm not referring to her being a lawyer who got her education from the Stetson University School of Law with its coveted 91st in the nation ranking, nor am I meaning the fact that she is employed by the Friedman Sklar law firm (but even at her ripe age has not made partner).  I'm not even alluding to her private pilot's license and love of flying bug smashers.  When I say she is one of the most impressive people I've ever encountered online, I'm not even talking about her once serving as vice president of the East Hampton Aviation Association before that private airport got shut down with her kicking and screaming.

No, what makes her so impressive is her incredible stupidity fused with insecurity that she tries to pawn off as confidence online and her amazing ability to combine the topic of aviation and the law and prove herself to be a complete moron in both realms.

She goes by Skye Hawk over on Facebook (edit: which she made non-public in response to this post, before making her profile public again) and she entered my world by responding to my comment on a podcast page about the unlawful actions of military pilots conducting unlawful actions in Iran.  Rather than discuss Article 1 of the Constitution or section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution, however, she responded to me with this gem that would no doubt make her law partner bosses and former fellow board members proud:

Notice the attempt to go Alpha with the response to somebody out of the blue, bringing up "low T" and calling them "princess."  Ms. Slye should probably talk to a shrink about what prompts that kind of pseudo-tough-guy talk.  But it was a discussion about military pilots and she was obviously trying to fit in with our ethos with her civilian hobby airplane parked outside.  At any rate, I appreciate her setting the tone but what I find fascinating is that this lawyer from a law school I had to Google, completely skips an opportunity to discuss the law, and then demonstrates the trait of the most accomplished lawyers.....failing to do simple research and then just wrongly asserting a fact.  With one simple click on my profile to, you know, harness information about the subject right at her fingertips, she could have easily seen that her false claim (that I "never saw a single a combat mission [sic]") was false.  But that was far too much work for the ever-so-accomplished, Kathryn A. Slye, esquire.  Photos of me in combat, photos of me wearing medals for valor in combat, or my 1000 combat hour patch would have proved more useful than Westlaw to this private pilot, but alas, such an investigation was too high a bar.  She is the kind of lawyer and pilot who simply conjures and asserts facts from thin air which, as we all know, is a highly sought skill if you wish to lose in court or crash into a tree.

So I responded to the Stetson-Something-Or-Other alum who wanted absolutely no part in discussing the law, to see if she wanted to continue her discussion of my lack of combat experience:

So Ms. Slye decided to dust off that old keyboard, do some online research, completely come away even dumber than she started, and then respond and block me so that I could not see nor respond to her most recent contribution.  Her fake-confidence and "low T" insults evaporated into a chicken shit maneuver where she completely avoided the false combat assertion she made, and instead just added even more false claims from the ten minutes she spent practicing her Google Fu.

If you want to lose in court, or lose your life, hire this lawyer pilot now!

Normally a moron like Ms. Slye wouldn't merit a blog post, but given the repeated defamation after failing in basic research skills mastered by fourth graders today, and her cowardly maneuver to keep me from effectively responding to her defamation in that discussion where she posted it, I'll take the opportunity to respond to it here.

Yes, I retired as a Major.  I assume that was supposed to be an insult.  If so, I will try to recover.  But I did not retire at 22 years, I retired at 20 years.

Yes, I did have multiple formal reprimands and my security clearances were suspended after I refused an unlawful order to murder an American citizen outside a war zone who was no imminent threat and tendered my resignation.  My clearances were suspended, not revoked, pending an investigation by the Air Force Central Adjudication Facility (AFCAF) which makes the decision to revoke clearances or not.  They issued their decision on 09/27/2012 on the order I refused, my formal reprimands, and ruled in my favor and restored all my clearances.  Ms. Slye would have seen my favorite part of this ruling which adorns a plaque in my retirement shadow box and the part most relevant to her accusation here, had she simply looked at my Facebook profile picture.  It's literally my profile picture:

But again, such right-at-your-fingers research is far too much to ask of the impressive Kathryn A. Slye, esquire!  Likewise, her false claim that I was "forced" to resign my commission or face a court-martial (a legal proceeding so therefore something she struggles to understand) is a novel conjuring on her part.  Especially given that the military did not accept my resignation.  Perhaps in her world, it's a 4D chess move to "force" somebody to resign, then not accept it, and then also not court-martial them.  As a side note, I am frightened for any of her unsuspecting passengers with her at the controls, but I digress.

Which brings us to my favorite false allegation.  That I was never in the squadron that flies the AC-130U Gunship and that I do not have 1000 combat hours in that aircraft.  Her passengers must be excited to know that if her airplane runs out of fuel, she can just imagine avgas into existence!  Like God himself, Ms. Slye need merely breathe reality into existence with her words.  A skill that must make her legal writings a real pleasure for judges (and especially the other party) to read I'm sure.

But, it turns out, I did in fact fly the AC-130U and was a member of that squadron (they tend to not let people outside the squadron fly that aircraft) and I do have 1000 combat hours.  Below is video of my retirement ceremony (you have to watch on YouTube, it doesn't play in an embed) literally in that squadron, officiated by my wife who I met in that very squadron many years prior.  The same video on the intro to this blog, which is listed on my Facebook profile, much too hidden for even the most erudite lawyers.

As to my frivolous lawsuits, the State of Washington didn't think my lawsuit was frivolous since I won in federal court and had their unconstitutional law struck down.  Nor did the CMSgt of the Air Force think my lawsuit was frivolous when she settled, reversed her unconstitutional action, and the Air Force changed its policy as a result.  The Stars and Stripes wrote about that court win and mentioned I flew the "C-130U" aircraft which was a typo:

Rynearson received a Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism after successfully defending his aircraft from “numerous anti-aircraft artillery attacks as a C-130U co-pilot during a March 20, 2003, night mission in Iraq. He and the rest of the aircraft’s crew supported outnumbered special operations forces in a battle for an Iraqi petroleum pipeline, according to the award citation online.

Given that Slye repeated that typo referencing a mythical C-130U, instead of the AC-130U, I imagine she obviously read that very article and still managed to make her false claim in contravention of what the article informed her, which is truly impressive.  It shows that Ms. Slye is not only a moron who can't research, but more importantly, that she's also dishonest and will purposefully lie in an attempt to damage the reputation of a stranger she disagrees with in a Facebook discussion.  Pull up, Ms. Slye, pull up!

So to close, it was a remarkable experience being introduced to this lawyer and private pilot who so masterfully shows that she lacks any ability to do the most basic research and yet doesn't let that stop her from purposefully asserting idiotically false claims.  Kathryn Slye is truly a basket of damaged goods and one of the dumbest individuals I have ever encountered.  Her passengers and clients are treading in dangerous waters with that mental defective with extreme daddy issues.

And so it goes.

Today The Final Nail in America's Coffin is Placed - RIP America

Unfortunately the Rule passed just now and no debate or vote was allowed on section 219, integration of US military technology and supply chains with Israel’s.

The NDAA will receive a recorded vote tomorrow with section 219 in it. I’ll vote no.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) July 21, 2026

The treasonous end of America is happening without so much as a whimper from so many public servants charged with defending the sovereignty of America.

Conquer the unprincipled minds of the average American, and conquering the rest of the nation is easy work. This nation is doomed. Here's how it will play out for those taking notes:

a) this NDAA passes and entangles our national defense and our tools of violence with the biggest enemy of America, the one that spies on us, murders our sailors and activists, had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attackers and celebrated the Twin Towers being hit, and gives a hero's welcome to spies like Jon Pollard...

b) the "Data Centers" pop up throughout the nation, delivering intelligence and targeting information straight to Israel who controls the "private" companies, which have been given all of our information thanks to their puppets in our government who fascistic fused our public levers with their private ones, and a digital currency and identification and tracking system through these nodes rules over the American people...

c) Israel starts ratcheting up its orders upon everyday Americans, the draft, increased taxes, more outright theft...

d) idiot Americans who were taught by frauds in church to slavishly love a foreign government begin waking up and realize they've been had by a nation that uses child molestation as a tool of power and that is filled with people who, who woulda thunk it, despise Christians and see them merely as easy marks to be manipulated...

e) the targeted assassinations, de-banking, and mass arrests using the IDF bases in America, sold as "Data Centers," begin in earnest as the anger in America grows over their subjugation...

f) the red white and blue over the White House is replaced with the Israeli flag, instead of simply flying next to the American flag so frequently in our nation's capitol and the American people become the largest slave population in the world.

Enjoy the show. This is how stupidity and lack of character destroys the greatest nation to ever exist. Entirely predictable.

Unworthy Military Officers Get Young American Girls Killed

Army Pvt. Isabella Gonzales of Carrollton, Texas died because the officers appointed above her are unworthy of their comissions and serve installed politicians who serve a terrorist foreign government.

It's not just social media banter.  Unworthy military officers get girls like Isabella killed.  It's understandable for a nineteen year old private to not understand the weight of public service and her oath, but it is inexcusable and unforgivable for college educated military officers to not be up to the task.

Isabella died because our officer corps is almost entirely comprised of those unworthy to wear the uniform. 

Donald Trump Sacrifices More American Service Members Upon His Foreign Altar

The Pedo-in-Chief is just getting warmed up though.  Too bad these service members didn't refuse the unlawful orders to participate in this unconstitutional action in the Middle East as they swore before God and country to do.

Tonight we will have to hit Iran hard in response to our troops being killed in Jordan. After that, we need to end this before it escalates further.

Strike & simultaneously pull our forces out—remove Iran’s leverage and move on to economic negotiations.

Restore order. https://t.co/CgQeE5Y3lH

— Joe Kent (@joekent16jan19) July 18, 2026

Even the pretend dissenter Joe Kent (CIA guy who participated in unconstitutional actions in Syria) is advocating for escalation in the unlawful war of aggression that we started, simply because Iran retaliated.  Very dumb take for a guy who tries to talk strategy.  Joe Kent is just another example of the maxim that when the people need a dissenter, one will be provided to them by the oligarchy.  But Joe is letting his mask slip further than usual.

Get ready for body bags.  But if you have principle you'll refuse to violate the Constitution and you'll refuse unlawful orders to participate.  For the rest of you unprincipled folks who haven't even the foggiest concern for what it means to be a public servant rather than a hired thug, don't expect thoughts and prayers from those of us you're defrauding with your unlawful conduct.

If you come back as our service members are increasingly coming back, in flag draped coffins, you will be coming back as part of a sacrifice.  But it's a human sacrifice of a willing participant, not unlike those who used to volunteer to be a human sacrifice for the Aztec priests.  I like the spirit of MTG's comment, but I have to disagree that the participants aren't willing participants.

Sacrifice?? What the fuck are you talking about??

They did not willingly sacrifice themselves.

They were killed because of the war you, Trump, and the admin, are waging on behalf of a FOREIGN COUNTRY, Israel.

You mean their deaths fuel your bloodlust for a senseless war. https://t.co/A0PhmLvHzx

— Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@FmrRepMTG) July 18, 2026