I am floored this question has been asked. But it's just a question. Like an electrical engineer might ask "what is AC power?" or how a chef might ask, "what is a knife?" Or how an oath breaker might ask how a military officer thinks they should be questioning whether orders are constitutional or not. Sure, it shows that the person asking is a complete moron who has no business in their profession, but at the end of the day it's just a question.
Yes, we take an oath to the Constitution because we have zero ability or expectation to know it and to abide by it. That's why the Constitution itself requires we take an oath to the Constitution, because unless we're lawyers, we have no obligation to understand it and abide by it. All that training about an obligation to refuse unlawful orders? Oh, that's all just nonsense. Taxpayer footing the bill for four years of college education for military officers? Well, that's not enough education to follow instructions, it's so very difficult stuff! We need the "experts" to tell us what it says. So, if you're ordered to go into Wal-Mart and shoot everybody wearing a blue hat, you do it, unless you're a lawyer because you can't know the law, obviously.
Sua Stupidity is beyond an idiot. Truly, astonishingly, absolutely a moron of epic proportions. Which is to be expected from an enlisted guy who was court martialed in the Air Force and discharged with an other than honorable status. But he's here to explain the law to military officers and what their obligations to it are, even though he was given the boot for being unable to comply with the law and control his sexual inclinations.
Sua Stupidity is only outdone by this foreign propagandist who tells us the Framers didn't think Congress could handle the time sensitive nature of going to war with Iran because, well, Iran was only about a lifetime away for them across the ocean. But Lord Fuckwad is absolutely wrong in his patently false assertion. The Constitution doesn't give a shit about time sensitivity and it did not give the power to the President to do war shit whenever he personally thinks its urgent. Article 1 gives power to Congress to declare war, and Article 2 gives commander and chief power to the POTUS to execute wars directed by Congress. That's it.
Fortunately the Framers also gave Congress the power to make all laws necessary and proper for bringing into execution all powers given to any part of the federal government. So when technology flattened the earth, Congress did think about the time sensitivity aspect and they passed the War Powers Resolution. And in Section 1541(c) of that law, it allows the President to conduct war for up to sixty days without pre-approval from Congress if, and only if, done in response to an attack on the United States or its military. It then allows the POTUS to extend that to ninety days if an attack on the United States has prevented Congress from being able to meet.
The war in Iran is unlawful. It's obvious. And it is absolutely the duty and obligation of professional military officers to know the Constitution and to limit their actions according to it. That doesn't change because puppet number one representing THE LEFT and puppet number two representing THE RIGHT are on the job trying to convince service members that their oaths to the Constitution don't mean shit. Similar to how Ghislaine Maxwell was an active Reddit moderator, these people who hate America know the Internet is key to destroying our nation one post at a time from the inside, like the parasites that they are.
But then some are just morons who somehow, despite a college education, think that America was founded such that the best perk of being elected President was having your own private army to use however you want, Congress be damned, debate be damned, clear text to the contrary in the Constitution be damned. It's no wonder our military does so poorly when even one military officer can be this completely wrong about a basic of his profession and so completely ignorant of the nation he defrauds one LES at a time which is the just the "new modern way" of being a military officer:
Lord FuckWad is not, however, a moron. Rather he purposefully tries to confuse others and to steer them away from their oaths because his intent is to achieve a foreign agenda. We see this behavior all across the Internet and it is state sponsored.
So he claims the War Powers Resolution gives the POTUS ninety days to "do what thou wilt." The only problem? That's not what the War Powers Resolution states. Instead, it says Congress must declare or authorize war unless the United States or its military is attacked, in which case the POTUS can act unilaterally for up to sixty days and can extend that to ninety days only if the attack on the United States prevents Congress from physically meeting. Super simple stuff for those who care to read the law, but this foreign operative isn't interested in educating officers on the law, he's interested in getting them to abandon it in order to support a hostile foreign nation's agenda. Much like his leftist twin, Sua Stupidity, the Air Force jailed and charged this clown for lack of character and not being able to follow laws, so I suppose it's not shocking he'd be here trying to get other military officers to behave similarly. A guy who can't even be faithful to his wife doesn't have what it takes to be to faithful to his country. I bet I know who has picked up his check in his civilian life...
Amazing how a disgraced civilian would spend years spreading falsities on a military forum after the fact. I wonder what motivates a guy to do such a thing?
The oath of office applies to officers who are below the rank of General. That, you might recall, is one of those things pointed out to you in the service. Just because you couldn't hack the standard doesn't mean there is no standard. Just like not cheating on your wife, by banging enlisted members you are charged with leading, is one of those military rules that doesn't only apply to flag officers.
Oh, and an order to conduct an unlawful campaign is what we in the business call "an illegal order." Bank robbery is illegal. Therefore an order to commit bank robbery is also illegal. This isn't difficult for those whose moral compass and character isn't Code 3.
The rest of us should decline the recommendation of the disgraced to forgo the word of our law and to instead trust the likes of Sua Stupidity and Lord FuckWad, who both were unable to comply with the law because of their inability to control their sexual inclinations. The Epstein Class in Camo may try to convince you they are the experts these days, but they are not, despite the fact their lack of character is so greatly modeled by those in the upper echelons of our government.
But to be fair, if only Lord FuckWad's wife could find a man as loyal to her, as her husband is to Israel when he's not cheating on her. Sure, his lies caused pain to her, but his lies for Israel cause ecstasy for his foreign masters. Although it seems she smartly dumped him. A lack of character, a lack of honesty, and a lack of loyalty....yeah she can do better. But I do enjoy watching him recycle old fictions about Iraq having something to do with 9/11 and revising history about how proud the nation was to enter that quagmire. He's ready to sign those Marines up to die in Iran! I wonder how bushy his eyebrows are?
Posts
