They couldn't make their plans anymore obvious on the media they have purchased. The ole two-fer. Blame it on Iran while boosting the police state they own in their puppet nation.
Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
You Are Being Told to Blame Iran When Israel Attacks The United States Soon
In a shocking report that "our government" is now releasing about a message "intercepted" that is "believed to have originated from Iran" that was issued ten days ago, but which you're just now finding out about, we are being primed to pin blame on Iran when we get attacked on our homeland because the DHS is too busy murdering American protestors to stop it. Thankfully, these media reports "calling all Iranian sleeper cells, you've been activated!" will in no way help deliver the message to activate Iranian sleeper cells by putting it out on the media.
Israel thinks you are dumb. They just want you primed to blame Iran when they attack the United States as they have a record of doing.
Count on it and stay away from population centers and airports to try to mitigate becoming the next American casualty at the hands of Israel.
Stop Thinking our Illegitimate Judiciary Will Fix Things
The third branch of government will not fix the tyranny of our nation, they are a part of it. They are federal politicians in dresses, coming from elite backgrounds and circles where the worst people imaginable making headlines today spring and go to work destroying our nation. They only are seen as credible by the naive because of the intense propaganda of pomp that exists to make them seem above the fray. They are not above the fray or out of reach of the corruption. And like the two other branches of our federal government, they do not work for the American people. The examples making this clear are innumerable, but one recent decision stands out.
When the court writes "safety" it really means tyranny.
Monday, March 9, 2026
Just a Reminder, the Draft is Unconstitutional, Even When Done for an Unlawful War
Rumors that our foreign-owned puppet government is considering reinstating the draft in its efforts to murder and steal in its illegal war on behalf of the foreign enemy that controls our puppets through blackmail and pedophilia.
Even if the Epstein War were lawful, which it is most assuredly not, the military draft is itself unconstitutional.
It doesn't matter how government courts have ruled. The law is the law and the Thirteenth Amendment is the supreme law of the land and states:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
I would recommend Americans with any fighting spirit refuse to go die. It's not that the foreign government that owns our puppet politicians wants you to fight for them. It wants you to die for them. They have further designs on the United States and they don't want it populated with Americans willing to fight.
Sunday, March 8, 2026
The Most Dishonorable Death an American "Service" Member Could Ever Have
Failing in your duty to refuse unlawful orders.
Failing all of this before the Americans who pay you, while also murdering innocents in another country.
Failing all of this in an action that will result in making America less safe and more poor, and perhaps utterly destroy it and the world.
Failing all of this because you were unlawfully ordered to by a President who is a puppet of a hostile foreign nation that has repeatedly attacked the United States, murdered the sailors on the USS Liberty, spies in the White House, staffed the White House, murdered American journalists, and which conducts the most heinous actions against others.
Failing all of this because that foreign nation controls President Trump because he is a pedophile and compromised, something you know, because it's too obvious to be denied, yet you didn't care.
I cannot think of a more dishonorable and disgraceful way to live as an American military service member, let alone die as one.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S WAR!pic.twitter.com/aukRYfBesz
— Christopher Helali (@ChrisHelali) March 11, 2026
Thursday, March 5, 2026
Israel's Literal Conquering of the United States Nearing Completion
It's already undeniable that Israel has literally conquered the United States. The White House administration are all puppets of Israel. Israel owns the Congress and it owns both political parties. We have a Congressman who is a citizen of Israel and wears his IDF uniform while in Congress. We have multiple congressmen saying that their loyalty is to "Israel first."
While America would use an EC-130 or other platforms to broadcast American propaganda into puppet nations, Israel has simply purchased America's media while it funds many in the so-called "alternative media" to blast its propaganda. Israel has been extracting resources from America for many decades, leaving the American people with a staggering national debt that will collapse it in our lifetimes, sooner rather than later. What comes next for America, while Israel expands its world conquest agenda?
And now the founding documents of the United States have inexplicably been removed from the nuclear-bomb proof shelter in the National Archives and been put on a plane reportedly to travel around the nation, during a time of unlawful, unconstitutional, and unapproved war with Iran (but war nonetheless waged by a pedophile traitor named Donald Trump on behalf of his foreign owners) with false flags from Israel in the forecast, for the alleged purpose of displaying those sacred documents in various cities. Never before would anybody think to risk those documents in such a way, exposing them to aircraft malfunctions or theft, and certainly not at a time when attacks on the United States are anticipated. So why is this being done? They say it's because some people can't travel to DC, but why can't they? And who are these throngs of poor people who really want to put their eyes on the documents that founded our nation? Why do this when there is heightened risk to air travelers and risks of attack in our nation? Why would a government that has long ignored the Constitution, and especially this current foreign-owned administration, want to risk these documents in order to show poor people in various cities who are unable to travel to DC and who have such an urge that isn't associated with a half time Super Bowl show?
The real reason this is being done is because when those documents are "accidentally" destroyed or are stolen, it will serve as a powerful signal to the American people that their nation and form of government is over. That's why it is being done.
In fact, almost certainly, what will happen is that jet will be blown up with the documents onboard, and it will be Israel that does it, while they blame Iran. Mark my words. Then they can tie it into the DHS/TSA didn't get enough funding narrative and expand the police state. My guess is the attack(s) will involve hundreds or thousands of relatively small drones.
It's not hyperbole to say that Israel has conquered the United States. It is reality. Israel sees America as an enemy to be used against others enemies, and the whole world is the enemy as far as Israel is concerned. Right now it is having its various enemies attack each other. And Israel absolutely detests the people of America despite its propaganda to cover its theft and murder of Americans. As the surveillance cameras from Israeli companies and the AI from Israel-owned companies like Palantir and Oracle continue to build the American control grid (the same cameras that were used to murder the Ayatollah in Iran) and as the mask is dropped on what has occurred in America, people will see massive suffering from a new overt master, mask dropped, that sees them as less than human. All that suffering and innocent people dying in Iran is going to be our future here at home, and at the hands of the very same people.
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Military Members Should Refuse Orders to Strike Iran
Military members should refuse orders to strike Iran.
Not because striking Iran would be done at the behest of the greatest foreign enemy of the United States, the state of Israel, which owns our puppet government through blackmail and intimidation. Not because the action is done to advance the agenda of that foreign enemy, Israel, at the cost of American lives and treasure which our occupiers of course care nothing about, having murdered Americans themselves directly with the USS Liberty and more than likely had a hand in the attack on the Twin Towers. Not because Americans will suffer and die in much greater numbers than they are used to. It's not even because the United States is the terrorist nation waging a war of aggression, much like Germany in the 1940s, upon a sovereign nation. It's not even, believe it or not, that this idiotic action risks World War III with Iran aligned with China and Russia. Those are reasons why the United States should not make war on Iran, but those are not reasons why military members should refuse orders to invade Iran. We are not in the business of carrying out the will of the American people only when it makes sense and is a good idea.
No, the reason military members should refuse orders to strike Iran is because such an action is not the will of the American people, and violates the Constitution of the United States. Just like previous strikes against Iran, any future strikes will be unlawful. Congress did not authorize this action, it has not been debated, and Americans do not support this action from this incredibly unpopular puppet President who seeks a distraction from his extraordinary and wholesale coverup and pampering of the foreign pedophiles who own him and much of our government.
Unfortunately, I expect Israel will not be dissuaded and it will want to capitalize on the firm grasp it has on President Trump, both pretend political parties, and on all of our public and private centers of gravity. It's not just traitors like Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham who are puppets of our foreign enemy, Israel, it's the entire system. But the demographics are changing in America and people are waking up so Israel will not waste this opportunity to again advance their criminal agenda at the mere cost of American lives and prosperity.
Americans should be ready to suffer even further. Our government does not work for us so our will has absolutely zero bearing on its actions. And we cannot expect anybody in our military to refuse clearly unlawful and America-damaging orders. If my twenty-year military career taught me anything, it's that our military officers are absolutely unfit for service and do not have the character to uphold their oaths of office and our supreme law. So get ready for the massive fallout that will come from yet another epically stupid "American" decision made on order of the foreign nation that uses us like the disposable diaper that our nation has become. If a real war kicks off, we can expect attacks on our homeland with some being waged by Israel as necessary to advance the police state and tyranny that has been steadily built here over the years. Digital surveillance, disarmament, digital money, all of it will be unleashed upon the American people in the name of "war time." Trump's unconstitutional pursuit of so-called anti-semitism policies which obfuscate their actual purpose, to punish those who criticize the terrorist nation that occupies us, will likely lead to DHS targeting Americans for their speech in more brutal ways than Ron DeSantis and various university presidents have done so far. And that would give them some residents for the rash of new DHS prison camps we are told are being built for illegal immigrants, despite Trump's lackluster efforts against illegals while his stormtroopers seem much more occupied with American citizens. Either way, Americans, of course, can expect more poverty for themselves and their grandchildren and their great grandchildren as a result. That's the best case scenario anyway.
Sunday, January 25, 2026
The Tyranny is Here
What is the most frightening is that this level of effort was not done just to get a politician elected in a rigged American system. It was done to mind fuck Americans into support and cheering actions. Trump is going to put the final nail in the coffin of America. The puppeteers didn't put that much time and effort, while sacrificing the credibility of all the three letter agencies, to not get an outsized result from their evil investment.
It will be wholly unrecognizable as the United States before his term is up. America is over. We can expect black bagging, more targeted murders by the government, and there is nothing that can be done about it. All the technological tools that government is sending our inflation-ridden tax dollars to support all have one purpose -- to ensure tyranny can be meted out at the individual level with precision. So while it's innocent protestors being murdered right now, soon it will be people disappearing for making a social media post criticizing their lawless government (like they do in the United Kingdom). Remember how technology was used to go after J6'rs for the crime of exercising their right to protest? Think of that much more efficiently conducted and much more ruthlessly. And to all the chest-thumping morons who think Red Dawn is a playbook, I'm sorry to inform you that the Second Amendment is useless, violence will only accelerate the inevitable, and the only thing that remains is to wait for our turn on the train. Our future is indeed a nightmare.
Thursday, January 1, 2026
Thursday, December 18, 2025
Reflecting on My Aggressive Internet Behavior Due to Recent Criticism
As my three readers will know, I have for some time been accused, and especially recently, of being aggressive in my Internet activity. Tony Carr, and a long time admirer of mine posting anonymously, have called into question my brutal honesty (they don't characterize it as honesty of course). Tony wrote in the comments section the other day:
But as Anonymous points out, your vibe isn't debate or disagreement. Your vibe is hate. You are loose with serious words, which undercuts your whole shtick as a guy who is all about the seriousness of words. You slap labels on people cheaply, you reason inductively, and you disrespect and trash others by default.
What my "anonymous" follower certainly knows (he used the name "John Richards" back in the day and even contacted my mother-in-law at one point in his online tomfoolery), and as perhaps Tony knows as well, is that one of my "targets" was a fellow from Bainbridge Island where I had a run in with a politician and his leftist mob of Antifa nut jobs. Like my recent two-ship of critics, the bone of contention back then was, drum roll please, my speech and saying things that somebody else didn't like. Now, oddly enough, in those days I was running an experiment on civility given the critiques of my style in the military. I used to call it "Ben Franklin'ing" in discussions with the wife. Since these were our neighbors on a small island and I was no longer speaking to military folks, I tried to be as civil as I could be while still explaining to my neighbors my view that Clarence Moriwaki was unfit for a certain public position. My civil post explaining this was well received in the Bainbridge Island Open Community Facebook group, garnered many likes and a good conversation. It appeared to be local democracy in action.
And then a friend of Moriwaki's and an admin of the group, Houston Wade, deleted the thread in its entirety and banned me. Turns out, what a shocker, that it doesn't actually matter how you state your opinion when your opinion is not allowed by those in power.
I was then banned from all the local groups. Most would simply shrug this off and go about their day, especially if they aren't passionate about the subject. Democracy requires a vibrant bunch, and such vibrancy is tough to find these days. But I wanted to not be silenced, so I had to create alternative means of joining the conversation. Doing so, however, putting in all that extra effort to have your voice heard, opens you up to all the crazy claims of "obsession" and being a "stalker" and such when it comes to criticizing public folks with power. But at the heart, it's really about wanting to be able to express your view in a nation that requires spirited debate and holding power accountable to be healthy. But our digital age has made fascism and controlling conversation all too easy and it takes a great deal of work to make alternative inroads in such a situation. And our nation is far from healthy.
The end result is the appearance of the free speech required for an informed citizenry. After all, people are talking. But it's only some people. You don't see the people who are not allowed to talk. Some of the truly crazy people will be allowed from the "other side" because their participation actually helps those in power. But civil and yet accurate conversation is a threat and will not be tolerated. Given that most people increasingly don't discuss matters of any substance, it's easy for them to not realize how curated and controlled the discussion truly is because they don't face censorship in the same way.
So as I sought to do an end around against the machine that controlled speech about public matters in my neighborhood, I had to be far more persistent and more creative. While I remained civil, I flooded all avenues in my attempt to be heard. Civility isn't required, but I was doing a test. Given the results, I actually think trying to be polite isn't helpful, it's too easily mistaken for weakness and timidity and only encourages bad actors. I have also discovered a link between those who critique my communication "style" and those who attempt to silence me. But perhaps I'm wrong about my communication style? Maybe my attempts are "ineffective" not because of the fascism that grows every day in our nation but rather because of how I say things? That's what my critics have precisely told me recently.
Tony Carr and Mr. Anonymous think I am the reason for my "ineffective" rhetoric, and I only ran that one experiment, so perhaps I'm still wrong about the value of my communications? Maybe there is a more effective way to speak truth to power, or to expose people in government doing wrong? Maybe, as Tony says, it's not about what I say but how I say it?
Then again, as Charlie Kirk demonstrates, perhaps it's truly dangerous to be effective with words Perhaps so many courageous men and women from the Civil Rights era who peacefully demonstrated and spoke and who ended up dead might disagree about communication style? Maybe when dealing with power-hungry people of low character who will stop at nothing to silence others, could it be there is no way to be polite enough to keep them from vilification and demonization and violence against you?
Let's consider it an open question as I continue to reflect on the criticism of my communication style.
My anonymous follower was sure to like posts from Clarence Moriwaki (as did Dan Tarleton who even gave him money in his effort to silence my speech) and I spent tens of thousands of dollars of my own money on social media getting the word out about this vile politician (who was a public relations guy and media manipulator for his political masters) and the digital mob he had assembled. Moriwaki's close friend, and right hand man in this effort against me, was the guy I previously mentioned, Houston Wade. Houston Wade was truly despicable in a crowd of the truly despicable. He showed up to court to support his politician friend against me and was very active online spreading the most awful lies about your humble blogger. Their lies included the words of Tony Carr and his words even made it into court documents used against me. Imagine that. Houston Wade was central in the digital campaign to demonize me in my own community and to the broader audience online.
I have spent more time on Houston Wade than anybody else since those days. It's not even close. Sorry Brandon.
I have been active online and off trying to address the threat Houston Wade posed to the local community, and to his marks online, by using my harsh words and my inability to build consensus. StopClarenceMoriwaki.Com was one such avenue that my anonymous follower is very familiar with. I was so active, so extraordinarily dedicated to exposing Wade, that of course I have been routinely charged with being cRaZy and all the rest. Who makes multiple videos about an individual like that? Who makes all those memes? Holy God, who makes an online video game about his subject?! Beyond how abnormal such efforts are, who has the time? Who makes a website like HoustonWadeLies.Com? Why are you so obsessed with pointing out so-called character deficiencies and dangers of some guy you got in a spat with years ago???
I have persistently accused Houston Wade of intense projection, staggering dishonesty, a willingness to lie, advocating violence, warned of his obsession with mixing sexuality and violence in his imagery, using homosexuality as an insult despite claiming to be ultra "woke," and documented his frequent celebrations of death for anybody he disagreed with politically who met their demise. Houston Wade regularly mocked me online when his politician friend was using the courts against me, telling me how I was going to go to prison and there receive the unwanted male attention that so many prison movies have made infamous. I was also attacked by his supporters and mob members mercilessly. Death threats, multiple false police reports claiming I had broken into homes, and the most vile defamatory comments were made about me online. Houston Wade's former felon roommate left a string of unhinged threatening messages on my parents' answering machine on the other side of the country. Years later when my mother passed, her online obituary featured a comment, falsely asserting it was from me, which described incredible indecency between a mother and son, placed on her obituary just days after she passed away. I was alerted to that post by my grieving father. Houston Wade regularly made false comments online about her death.
When my wife and I went back to the island to cast ballots in a local election and to support an individual's free speech rights in court who I filed an amicus brief in support of despite hating every fiber of his being, we hired armed security to drive us around and provide protection. You might call that paranoid, but I know evil. And there is a staggering amount of legitimate evil on Bainbridge Island.
The free speech rights of the person I supported with my amicus brief was Houston Wade.
As in any contest for a worthy cause, there will be wounds and scars, even in digital combat and the contest of words. At least if you pick up a worthy cause. If you pick your battles, which is to say you actually pick battles, by using words to say something important in an attempt to better the world, to identify threats to the larger community. If you do that, you will face repercussion because evil people do not tolerate being exposed and you will face backlash. Nothing worth doing is easy. Or popular. Except criticizing the man who is in the ring taking the blows to express truthful things that threaten evil, that's easy enough to do and popular.
After I beat Clarence Moriwaki (a current Bainbridge Island City Council member) in court, badly, I was involved in efforts concerning Houston Wade behind the scenes as well as online. I was quick to report on his loss in court for defaming a neighbor in the absolute worst way, and broadcasting his bankruptcy that resulted, to his audience of potential victims. Wade brought me up in his court proceedings regularly in his many irrelevancies. He blamed me for some of his woes in court documents and testimony. I won't say that he was incorrect, but it didn't convince any of his judges. Be that as it may or may not be, I tried to reach any of his potential victims to let them know the character of the person they were dealing with and I enjoyed a large amount of success much to his dismay. Houston spent considerable time banning and censoring me from any community, starting with the "Bainbridge Island Open Community" Facebook group, and then reporting my posts in other areas, doing the thing that all frauds and liars do who smart from my accurate words.
While Wade was successful at getting Elon Musk's X platform to suspend my account, according to Grok, he was ultimately unsuccessful and soon I no longer had to inform folks about him as there was an army of people doing it who had seen the information I provided. In his podcast, he made it very clear how my ceaseless efforts caused him real torment.
In the video above, in addition to demonstrating the real pain I caused him, Houston Wade also makes the false claim that I am friends with child molesters (a frequent claim he lobbed at anybody he disagreed with, and one that has him nearly one million dollars in debt after a court ruling and that led to him declaring bankruptcy). Wade talks about my obsession with him and begs his audience to block me, concerned about the power truthful words might have on his grift. I would recommend readers watch this video before continuing to read below to really understand the full force of agony my words can cause some individuals. The video shows the real, purposeful, pain on Wade's face as a result of my efforts. At 13:27 Wade discusses his stalker (referring to me) and says:
It is exhausting, the thing is I know I'm not alone, because I know he has dozens of victims, so we all talk with each other and share and treasure each other's support because this guy is unending, he'll make websites about you, he'll make videos about you...
He's right. So many of my critics, excuse me, my "victims" who have suffered the "harassment" and the brunt of my harsh words, have communicated with Houston Wade in their shared effort to retaliate against me. It goes well beyond an Internet slap fight. But we'll leave that for another day.
As far as words go, it's really extreme stuff. I admit it. My words have been issued not just harshly, and truthfully, but also with the hope of causing pain by exposing the character of my subject. Does that make me a monster? Is there a difference between wanting to cause pain with the truth, rather than through lies, or am I the asshole and curmudgeon and prick that Tony Carr says I am because of how I conduct myself with words online regardless of the accuracy he credits me with? Who spends so much time "attacking" another person online, anyway? Trolls do from what I'm told. And "stalkers" of course. Houston Wade refers to me regularly as his "stalker" for expressing views about him he doesn't approve of, and doing it so frequently. His Twitter account lists his location as "in Rick Rynearson's head" yet his podcast's "winged rhino" flying animation makes it very clear that I am front and center inside his. And that was purposeful, the OODA Loop applied to our new digital landscape. But the question remains, who does that? Is there something wrong with me spending this much time "obsessing" over somebody online? Is this the vibe of hate that Tony Carr referenced? Am I the "serial stalker" who moves from target to target that Houston claims that I am? So many people take issue with my aggressive speech...
So, I chose to do some reflection, to ponder the recent criticism of my online activity... and I have decided that I will likely cease my intense online activity against Houston Wade. It's a start, after all, right?
I won't be ceasing because there is any real merit to these criticisms of my speech, of course, but rather because Houston Wade has just been arrested and charged for trying to do things to an eleven year old that shouldn't be imagined let alone attempted. Be forewarned when reading the details of the charging document I just linked, it's not a pleasant read. Edit: the charging document has now been revised with more charges and even worse details about multiple actual child victims, his fetish for dominating submissive children, and his use of bondage gear. And we all know some folks who really don't like words when they're not pleasant. Six years ago I tried to warn people about Houston Wade's mental/sexual state, but given the censorship and control of information, not many likely saw that explicit warning. Censors hate the truth. And some, really really hate it... Bad people don't like voices exposing them.
Cheers.











